Google is being hit on all sides.
On the same week Google was sued by a couple of former employees who accuse it of quashing conservative viewpoints, another former Google engineer is claiming company executives shut down his pro-diversity discussions at work.
ric Schmidt is an influential figure, even among the parade of powerful characters with whom I have had to cross paths since I founded WikiLeaks. In mid-May 2011 I was under house arrest in rural Norfolk, about three hours’ drive northeast of London.
The Federalist has some takeaways from James Damore’s civil suit against Google, which he accuses of discriminating against white male conservatives. You gotta see this stuff to believe the corporate culture there.
In the midst of the “fake news” hysteria last year, Google launched a project to help curate reliable information for its readers by identifying articles and sites that need fact-checking. And this may come as a surprise to some of you, but it looks like the tech giant’s truth project is imbued with a tiny bit of ideological and political bias.
Twitter admits to censoring tweets it does not like (eg. conservative).
In the latest undercover Project Veritas video investigation, eight current and former Twitter employees are on camera explaining steps the social media giant is taking to censor political content that they don’t like. James O’Keefe has just completed a book about this series entitled “AMERICAN PRAVDA: My fight for Truth in the Era of Fake News.”
Big Corporations like Twitter and Google wield enormous power over those they disagree with, and in the age of Trump, it’s only gotten worse.
For Twitter, this week has brought the attack of the right wing. First, it was sued by a banned far-right news blogger who claims the company violated his free-speech rights. Now Project Veritas has released a couple of videos clearly meant to portray Twitter as extremely liberal and biased – the latest in the barrage of conservatives’ criticism of tech companies’ purported bias against them.
On Thursday investigative journalist James O’Keefe and Project Veritas released a shocking report on how Twitter Corporation shadow bans conservative voices on the social media platform. Of course, the liberal US media ignored the shocking report by Project Veritas. What is more disturbing is that Twitter filed 869 labor condition applications for H1B visa and …
Mike Rowe of “Dirty Jobs” fame responds to being called an “anti-education, science doubting, ultra-right wing conservative” who should be fired.
TV host Mike Rowe is known for his measured, devastating take-downs of people who attack him or his work. He has perfected the art of subtly twisting the knife in the side of critics with calm, cool language. This skill was on display Thursday when Rowe responded to a woman criticized his politics on Facebook.
mikerowe.com, Michael Gregory Rowe is an American television host and narrator, actor and former opera singer best known for his work on the Discovery Channel series Dirty Jobs, Deadliest Catch, After the Catch, Somebody’s Gotta Do It – Mike Rowe introduces us to people who perform unique jobs in his CNN Original Series, Somebody’s Gotta Do It
Dirty Jobs follows Mike Rowe as he explores the dirtiest jobs in America. Learn more about Mike Rowe, host of Discovery’s Dirty Jobs.
Interesting video by J.J. McCullough about his two most controversial articles. One points out official bilingualism means that the 17% of Canadians who are bilingual hold all of the top spots in government institutions. As these are mostly left wingers from Quebec it has the net effect of moving Canadian culture to the left of its overall population. Pointing this out is considered very controversial which is why you never hear this truth spoken.
Bilingualism as requirement for top Canadian government jobs must be abolished if our culture is ever to reflect Canadians as a whole.
Talking about Quebec can get you in a lot of trouble. I should know, it happened to me. Twice. My two offending articles: http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/jj-mccullough/bilingual-elite-canada_b_4977174.html and: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/global-opinions/wp/2017/02/01/why-does-progressive-quebec-have-so-many-massacres/ Support me on Patreon: www.patreon.com/jjmccullough Follow me on Instagram: instagram.com/jjmccullough/
An important new study has for the first time calculated the total amount the federal government and four largest provinces spend on subsidizing businesses – a staggering $29 billion a year – and it estimates more than half of that spending is wasted. The aim of the spending in most cases is to improve economic performance.
In a good article on political leadership by MP Michelle Rempel in Macleans, she hits upon one of the big reasons why our culture has moved to the left.
First, the size and scope of government in Canada exponentially expanded around the time of the world wars. Since then, for better and worse, government has grown to touch virtually every aspect of a Canadian’s life.
My generation has grown up in a system in which government is so ubiquitous that many of us rarely think to question the role of government. We’ve developed a tendency to default to accepting the existence of the state across every area of our lives, and to look to the state as the solution to most public-policy issues.
This has led to a widening gulf between the size of the government and our individual ability and desire to scrutinize every aspect of it, and in turn, to scrutinize the people who we entrust with leading it.
When the government is automatically presumed to be responsible for every problem, its easier to be a victim than to take responsibility for ones own condition. Finding positive ways to reduce the size and scope of government is critical creating a more conservative culture.
This week, the prospect of an Oprah Winfrey presidential candidacy sparked a discussion about whether or not celebrities are automatically qualified to lead a government, on the basis of their celebrity alone. Praise the heavens. This dialogue is sorely needed, and not just in the United States. It affects us here too.
Third parties are playing a huge role in Canadian politics as they have no limits on donations and can spend unlimited funds between elections.
Inside the progressive think tank that really runs Canada
Millions in foreign funds spent in 2015 federal election to defeat Harper government, report alleges